Judge stops CMA from using undisclosed evidence to defend Concordia warrant
In the first case of its kind, the UK High Court recently ruled that the CMA cannot rely on redacted or withheld evidence when defending an application to discharge or vary search warrants. The judgment results from Concordia’s challenge to a search warrant that had been granted as part of the CMA’s investigation into alleged collusion in the market for hydrocortisone.
Also in this newsletter
CMA clears Just Eat/Hungryhouse merger and provisionally approves Tesco/Booker deal
European Commission fines five car safety equipment suppliers €34 million in cartel settlement
Vestager explains the role of competition in making globalisation work
